6 comments

Opinion: Storytelling Should Be What This Generation Is Remembered For

by on December 8, 2013
 

The passing console cycle has brought so much to gaming that it’s hard to pinpoint one particular innovation it should be remembered for.

Motion Control arrived and brought gaming to new and unexpected audiences, Activision’s Call of Duty series became an entertainment juggernaut, online gaming replaced split-screen gaming, and games consoles became more than just things you played games on.

With better visuals, larger audiences and bigger budgets, the sense of scale in games escalated dramatically. Indie games also thrived with the boom of Xbox LIVE Arcade, PSN and Steam giving a platform to many of the generation’s most unique titles.

Perhaps best of all, however, gaming began to fully-realise its potential as a story-telling medium. Great stories have always been told in games, but only in recent years have games explored what they can offer that other mediums simply cannot.

1775269-c9ekr

What games can offer storytelling is the same as what they can offer you and I over movies or books – true interactivity. Only in games can you become a leading man or woman and have a say in their story.

From Chrono Trigger to The Last Of Us, there have always been great stories in gaming told in the traditional linear way, but in the last eight or so years there has been a boom in interactive storytelling.

The biggest and most successful example would be Bioware’s Mass Effect series. What gripped so many was the ability to forge a leading character of your own. Your Sheppard could be gay or straight, male or female, good or evil – and the characters you shared that universe with would react appropriately to your actions.

It wasn’t a flawless execution of that idea but Mass Effect brought it to the attentions of millions and is an idea well worth pursuing in further games, even if the third instalment left a bitter after-taste for some.

Walking-dead-episode-3-lee-and-clementine-rv

Telltale’s The Walking Dead game stripped back the action that sometimes weighed the Mass Effect trilogy down and made one of gaming’s few genuine dramas. There was still shooting (it is a zombie game after all), but at the forefront there was the characters and their relationships.

With a timer on all your decisions – from simple dialogue options to choosing whether to lop off someone’s infected limb – the game wanted to feed on your instincts and reveal what you might actually do in these situations. It often provokes regret; even guilt, with the biggest decisions able to haunt you throughout your play-through.

Of course The Walking Dead had numerous technical issues, but what everyone recognised was Telltale’s ambitions and near flawless execution of them from a storytelling perspective. The fact many overlooked the occasional glitch or bug in favour of what the game triggered in them emotionally goes to show just how successful Telltale were.

Some levelled criticism at both examples because the endings didn’t differentiate due to your choices in any major way, but that misses the point. What both Mass Effect and The Walking Dead did was allow players to tailor their journey to those endings, and it’s in the journey that most enjoyment is to be had.

So we have examples of classically linear storytelling and examples of more tailored experiences, but there’s a third example in between.

reddead47

Whereas classic linear games enforce a sort-of pace (as much as you can in a game) open world settings can provide the opportunity and tools for a tailored experience even if there’s little input in the actual story.

In Red Dead Redemption, the key story beats remain the same throughout, but at what rate you take on the key missions is up to you. In between you can do what you like – you can get into a bar-room brawl, play poker, hunt wildlife or catch the attentions of local law enforcement.

Such open worlds fill themselves with the means for players to weave their own little stories against the backdrop of a wider narrative. The Elder Scrolls, Assassin’s Creed, and Saints Row series also do this, but to an even more open degree.

What Red Dead also exemplifies is how all aspects of a game can work as a cohesive whole in support of a story being told. Rockstar’s Western expanse was a barren, wild landscape that reflected its hero John Marston’s journey from desperation to losing himself and then finally to home.

Bioshock’s Rapture didn’t so much as reflect your own character as enforce the twisted madness of all the other characters. An underwater city as an insane place anyway, but throw in Big Daddys, Little Sisters, ADAM, EVE, and the Civil War that tore it all down and it becomes even madder – an oppressive, pressurized city that has already blown more than a few gaskets.

Papers-Please-Glory-To-Arstotzka

There have also been more experimental forms of narrative. Bioshock toyed with the habits of gamers, Braid played around with expectations, and the like of Limbo and Journey packed a wallop without even uttering a word.

Just this year Papers, Please has turned players into corrupt officials with the ability to save or crush fellow human lives. Gone Home was another to play with expectations but also toyed with largely unexplored themes.

The technology behind gaming is reaching a sort of plateau, meaning innovation will soon come from a more meaningful place. Developers will still strive to produce technical marvels and games of pure gaming bliss that don’t even need stories, and so they should! Alongside them however is a relatively new thirst for telling unique stories with real heart and soul.

Like this? Why not share it...
  • http://www.calvinrobinson.co.uk/ Calvin Robinson

    Good shout, Skipper.

  • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

    I must play Gone Home, The Walking Dead, and Red Dead Remeption-great games I’ve NEVER got my hand on and must! quick question: is the PS3 or 360 version of Rockstar’s games fare better overall with the games they’ve released on them, including GTA V, as I know GTA V has the USB issue and PS3′s load speeds are slow, etc. so which platform should I get Rockstar’s games for?

  • Ben Skipper

    I have Red Dead Redemption on 360 and GTA V on PS3, both run fine for me though GTA V’s load time at the start is incredibly slow. I imagine that’s the same on both consoles however

  • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

    Gotcha. I prefer using the 360 controller so I’ll get RDR on 360 and maybe get GTA V on PS3 to avoid needing a flash drive, as I actually lost mine so no chance I can play the game on 360. Yeah, probably the same on both but just to be safe for the latter I’m getting it on PS3 to try out the controls and if I don’t like how it plays on PS3 then get 360 version and a new flash drive.

  • http://GodisaGeek.com/ Adam Cook

    Gone Home (and Papers, Please) are WAY on top of my list of games I need to buy and play. In terms of GTA V, PS3/360 is good either way.

  • Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

    Cool. Looking forward to those games too. Thanks :-)