Opinion: The Problem With Microsoft’s One Vision

Is anyone actually surprised?

Everyone knew well before Microsoft unveiled the Xbox One last night what direction the company was taking. It’s a direction that will, and has, given gamers the hump, but it does make business sense and I do understand why they would chase the market they are chasing.

Everything Microsoft showed last night relating to the core interface, the seamless switching between media and even the use of Kinect all seemed perfectly fine, even if it wasn’t what many wanted to hear.

<iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” src=”http://vds.rightster.com/v/01z0w1pzx2qt8y?target=iframe&autoplay=0″ allowtransparency=”true” webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

When it came to anything relating to games however, last night proved to be a total mess, and for this reason their show will likely go down  as one of the most botched game console reveals ever. I don’t believe there’s anything wrong with a games console being more than a games console, but I do firmly believe that the actual playing of games should be simple – not a hot steaming mess.

xbox-720-next-announcement-reveal-screenshots-52Xbox One will require mandatory installs for all games, linked to one account but available to others on the same machine. To play that game on a friend’s console, however, you will need to be signed into your Xbox Live account on their device.

Last night Phil Harrison told Eurogamer: “Think about how you use a disc that you own of an Xbox 360 game. If I buy the disc from a store, I use that disc in my machine, I can give that disc to my son and he can play it on his 360 in his room. We both can’t play at the same time, but the disc is the key to playing. I can go round to your house and give you that disc and you can play on that game as well.

“What we’re doing with the digital permissions that we have for Xbox One is no different to that.”

Except that this only confuses matters, adding a layer of bullshit that is anti-consumer and designed purely for profit. How so? Well it essentially kills the pre-owned market. Buying and playing a pre-owned game on the console will consist of two purchases. First the in-shop purchase and then when you attempt to play the game you’ll be ordered to pay a cost imposed by Microsoft that matches the price of that title set on their own store. 

<iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” src=”http://vds.rightster.com/v/01z0w1pzx2qt8y?target=iframe&autoplay=0″ allowtransparency=”true” webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

Microsoft’s event was aimed very specifically at a sport and Call of Duty-loving audience. It’s a big audience, and one that won’t be reading anything like this, be it on this site or even the BBC’s. They’re an easy group to make money from, even easier than the core gaming market left so disappointed last night. A success in our world requires innovation, a success in theirs requires more of the same.

It’s fair enough really, if someone is perfectly happy playing only FIFA and Call of Duty each year then more power to them. What doesn’t stick right is how blatantly Microsoft are taking these people for a ride. How will that audience react to required installations and having to pay an additional charge to play pre-owned games? Things like this will factor not into the initial success of the machine, but certainly into the year that follows.

microsoft-xbox-one-4842

Microsoft are intent on making ‘Xbox’ more than just a gaming brand, and their bold vision should be commended on that front, but it’s important to realise that the word Xbox is now synonymous with the world of gaming. To the majority of the public that’s all it is and ever will be – “What’s an Xbox?” “It’s a games machine”. That won’t go away, and yet Microsoft seem to want it to.

As I said earlier there’s nothing wrong with a games console that lets you watch Netflix or stream Sky (something that’s saved my family a few scraps for the TV remote). On the 360 it’s all added value, but only value added to a core and simple thing that the box did – play games.

All the talk of TV, sports, TV, TV, sports and sports could have been shrugged off, or would have caused less of an uproar last night, if the actual playing of the games we cry out for, and will see at E3 next month, were simple to play and enjoy.

Everyone who buys an Xbox One later this year will be buying it as a games console, and yet that’s the part of the machine Microsoft seem intent to complicate and exploit for their own gain. The beginning of a console cycle is when you need the core gamers most, their support is a strong foundation onto which further success is found.

But will a foundation of casual gamers support the weight of Microsoft’s ambition?


  • Wicket2961

    I am a gamer and I want to game. I have a TV and TV box, a DVD player and a laptop. I refuse to pay for hardware and apps that I am not interested in or can use elsewhere. On top of this, Xbox will most probably charge you a subscription fee again in order to access Netflix and Lovefilm and youtube even though we can do this for free elsewhere.

    I enjoyed the Xbox 360 years but I am looking forward to going back to Playstation and playing on a console made solely for gamers.

  • Malik hassanaah

    Xbox exposing tv functions during there consoles reveiling was the time to reveil those functions,…! E3 is for the unveiling of games,..always has been,…Microsoft took perfect advantage at there unveiling! Considering both next generation PC consoles will be on equal footing in the graphics department,..Microsoft opened the door for those crowds that want this particular entertainment!Great for them, and those who want those functions! Microsoft only proved that they have more to offer outside gaming! But with Kinects totally intergraded most software producers are favoring the Xbox One as the system who will deliver a more exciting gaming experience!

  • LupineMP3j

    Where are you getting this information about “most software producers?” Last I heard, most software producers were ditching the Xbox in favor of the PS4.

    Don’t buy into the gimmicks alone.

  • Chris Scott

    I’m not sure where you are getting your information from either, as it is as unfounded as the statement you are questioning.

  • Chris Scott

    If you think Sony isn’t also going to aim for this wide net strategy, I feel you are going to be let down.

  • Chris Scott

    “Except that this only confuses matters, adding a layer of bullshit that is anti-consumer and designed purely for profit. How so? ”

    Does it really confuse matters? And Is Steam an added layer of bullshit that is anti-consumer?

    Last I checked PC gamers were quite happy and that is quite key because 15 years ago, there was a used game market for PC games that has all but been squashed out by publishers and online distribution. This is no different than that evolution and after years of people saying PC gaming is dead, it is quite alive and well.

    The other side of all this, is we don’t know if Sony will incorporate any/or all of these perceived issues into their new system as well and if they do, then both systems are on equal footing with no real option for “gamers” other than to suck it up and take it.

    I think you make some good points and there is cause for potential concern but Sony should also be looked at with a skeptical eye because their track record of delivering on their promises is shoddy at best and there are an awful lot of questions regarding their system that need to addressed. I think at this point it is too early to condemn either company for the choices they’ve made as there really isn’t enough concrete data to go on for either one and a lot of this is pie in the sky ideals that may or may not ever come to fruition.

Related Articles